Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeodynamic agriculture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Homeodynamic agriculture[edit]
- Homeodynamic agriculture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable concept. Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources unconnected to the topic. Bongomatic 17:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you might have to let this squeak by given those two sources, and also since Nastati is cited at least once. I grant you readily it's thin, though: weak keep. Drmies (talk) 02:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - it's significant enough in Italy and Greece as method of agriculture, adopted by over 400 farms. --EPadmirateur (talk) 22:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.