Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homegrown Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Homegrown Games[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious lack of notability; but a speedy request was declined. Chutznik (talk) 02:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 03:17, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:CORP, no significant coverage online from reliable sources per WP:RS, though they are mentioned in passing in reviews of their products online. MuffledThud (talk) 18:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the only news hits appear to be in relation to Painkiller: Ressurection. No coverage of the company itself. Marasmusine (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability is not inherited (see WP:NOTINHERITED) and the developer of a notable game - particularly where it's only one notable game - is not independently notable without coverage that's independent of the game. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.