Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home Ice Cream

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 12:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Home Ice Cream[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing for a mid-size retail chain. Article contains no encyclopedically relevant content; significant RS coverage not found. No evidence of a cult following or other impact on the industry. Article lists one source; searches turn up passing mentions and PR-driven coverage. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:51, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:52, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:CORP. run of the mill coverage. LibStar (talk) 14:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (Never heard of them.) Mostly seems very routine commercial/marketing references available and nothing jumps out as "notable" that I could find. Aoziwe (talk) 01:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.