Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home (Chris de Burgh album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (WP:SNOW close). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Home (Chris de Burgh album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub album article with little more than a track listing and no indication of notability beyond two charts. Jax 0677 (talk) 23:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: also made no. 19 in Switzerland, 48 in Austria, and 199 in Belgium (Wallonia), apart from the German and UK chart entries mentioned in the article. Richard3120 (talk) 04:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Charted in multiple countries and received multiple significant coverage and further background info that can be used to expand the article: [1], [2], [3]. --Michig (talk) 06:26, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above sources; subject meets WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. gongshow talk 07:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per charting in multiple countries, and the sources provided above. Another failure of WP:BEFORE by this nominator. Like six in a row now. Come on. Sergecross73 msg me 13:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Multi-charting album. Bad nomination. Carrite (talk) 04:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this singer-songwriter has had a long and award-winning career of many LPs. Taking out one charting LP will mess up the whole group of articles. Bearian (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Charting in multiple countries clearly meets notability criteria Spl237 (talk) 21:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.