Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HomeBank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 16:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HomeBank[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been tagged for notability since October 2008...the oldest notability tag on Wikipedia. Lets finally get a consensus as to whether it is notable enough for an article (and remove the tag) or whether it isn't notable at all and should be deleted. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Concerning the Amiga version, there is a short 1/2 page article in Amiga Format 113 (August 1998, pp. 47-48) and 1 1/2 page review in Total Amiga 15 (Summer 2003, pp, 39-40) - though I´m not sure about RS status of the later one. There is also a 1 page review of the AmiCygnix version in the Amiga Future 98 (September/October 2012, p. 23) and some short news on amiga-news.de. I expect similar coverage in the Linux related media (eg. this LinuxFormat/TuxRadar piece from 2009: [1] and c't magazine 21/2017 p. 136 - behind pay-wall [2]). I think right enough to satisfy GNG. I will try to improve this article, if I find the time (I hoped to do that during the last weekend, but playing video games takes too much of my free time). Pavlor (talk) 11:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:GNG, in addition to those listed by Pavlor above, reviews by TechRadar - here, News Break - here, and H2S Media - "Best Free & open source personal finance management software 2020", Coolabahapple (talk) 01:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:41, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.