Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homage to the Lagan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Homage to the Lagan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG. I don't believe this sculpture is notable: it hasn't received any coverage from what I can find on the internet and the only reference of this article is a dead end, so in effect, there are no references on this article. It's a stub and doesn't pass the GNG guideline, where significant coverage is required. st170e^talk 22:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 22:56, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-noable per WP:GNG. KGirlTrucker87^{talk what I'm been doing} 10:21, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: pernom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.