Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Trinity School, Kanjikode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kanjikode. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Trinity School, Kanjikode[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. No Reliable Sources found with a WP:BEFORE. YogeshWarah^Talk 05:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. YogeshWarah^Talk 05:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. YogeshWarah^Talk 05:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. YogeshWarah^Talk 05:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. YogeshWarah^Talk 05:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. YogeshWarah^Talk 05:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - can't find any in-depth coverage of this school. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:10, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - to Kanjikode, where it is mentioned. Deletion would be suitable, otherwise. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 17:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above, if only per WP:CHEAP. This school seems to lack even the usual routine coverage; it fails the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to target already identified. Since it's mentioned there and clearly isn't notable enough on it's own for a separate article. Plus, as the last "voter" says, redirects are cheap and it might be a viable search term. So there's really no reason to not redirect it. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.