Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holton Rower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Holton Rower[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by a gallery owner, featuring lots of buzzwords (such as "featured") but little substance. There is next to nothing in terms of coverage--a few mentions on some art websites and his name is dropped in the NYT once or twice, and a Dutch paper opines in four sentences that his "pour paintings" might make a fun family activity. Drmies (talk) 14:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Advertisement. Gamaliel (talk) 02:18, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TB randley 17:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet relevant notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This does seem to read a bit like an advertisement, I think.Sophiahounslow (talk) 10:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.