Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Wortell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion; non-notable subject per Wikipedia's standards. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Holly Wortell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable performer; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. References are only mentions or not independent of subject. clpo13_(talk) 01:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As written, fails the policies mentioned by the nom. GNews shows only mentions in passing, primarily in local media too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 01:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 01:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 01:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NACTOR MarnetteD|Talk 02:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I simply see nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I originally proposed this article for deletion because this performer fails WP:NACTOR. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom Vrac (talk) 12:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could support keeping this article if there were WP:RS, but it does not seem that there are.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.