Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Pike

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC) But she is a very nice woman.[reply]

Holly Pike[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG as a necessary article. Aaaccc (talk), 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete - I agree this should be deleted, sadly the article is written better then some politicians that should have articles but hers is not needed. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 02:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very slender findings on GS. Acting principal, so would not pass WP:Prof#C6 even if stature of establishment were confirmed. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Neither interim admin nor unsuccessful politician makes for notability. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.