Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly McCall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Holly McCall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The content isn't so much unsourced an non existent, technical passes through award win aside there appears to be no additional sourced content to add. On that basis clearly fails below the line. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There seem to be just two sentences in this article to cite three films which this actress was in, and two of them are in wikilink text, indicating that these films have articles in Wikipedia. So, could this be merged with one of these two articles?Vorbee (talk) 22:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

McCall's roles in the two blue-linked films were minor, one of several performers in a large group sex scene in each film. This would be merging trivia about an extra. IAFD indicates a larger role in Tangerine, but do reliable sources acknowledge it? • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unreferenced and non-notable BLP. --Lockley (talk) 03:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No references. No evidence of notability. Maproom (talk) 10:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability and hasn't won any significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:44, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.