Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holland Meissner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Holland Meissner[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

absolutely no coverage about this person to the point that it borders on a hoax. Completely and utterly not notable. Praxidicae (talk) 20:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I edit-conflicted on attempting to move it to draftspace, now moot. The subject clearly exists as an author, so not a hoax. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is more to a hoax than "doesn't exist" but we should not be draftifying unencyclopedic nonsense. The claims thrown in here were just done to avoid an A7. It's completely made up that she was in a Bollywood film and it's very obvious. Also claiming "her son is in a film!" is also not a claim of notability for the subject but that's not what this AFD is about. Also I disagree with "clearly exists as an author." I could link to my shitty fanfiction from when I was 16 that I tried to self publish on Amazon, it doesn't make me an author. Praxidicae (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. That last sentence made me laugh! Foxnpichu (talk) 22:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:14, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:14, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG. Do not draftify unless actual sources turn up. b uidhe 22:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable person with no coverage. Foxnpichu (talk) 22:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: She appears to have a cooking show (here is an episode on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tkp0pTEMfY), but she doesn't pass the notability standards unfortunately. And I can't find any credit of her in the film which the article cites; maybe she was an extra. Dflaw4 (talk) 01:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:15, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While its not a hoax, because her book is verifiable, she's clearly just a run of the mill vlogger, one of tens of thousands. FWIW, my domestic partner is a vlogger with over 60 episodes on social media about healthy Filipino cuisine, but I would not say he's notable. As far as one small role, it's not enough for WP:NACTOR; again, lots of people have been in films. She does not inherit notability from her son. Finally, her turn as Chrissy Teigen's bete noir is a literally 15 minutes of fame situation. Bearian (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does her son have his own article? Foxnpichu (talk) 11:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable without any doubt. PK650 (talk) 21:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of passing GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No objection to recreation if the subject becomes notable. I see that she wrote a book. Wm335td (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.