Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holistic Centre Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Holistic Centre Group[edit]

Advertisement. Non-notable company. No Google hits. Violates WP:CORP Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As nominator. --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as pseudoscientific vanispam. —porg es_(talk) 01:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no assertion of notability. Metamagician3000 02:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - advertisement, vanity, spam. - Richardcavell 02:20, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per, well, all of the above. Darquis 02:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - not intended as an advertisement, attempt has been made to be balanced. Though the company is not notable in a grandiouse sense it is important to the communities it serves - is this not important? Google search for people working there eg Clare Badrick or Sarah Kypers. Rather than just advise for deletion, recommend suitable changes. User: yabasto 30/04/06 13:17
Delete Basically a local clinic, though non-traditional. Not notable. Fan1967 18:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet WP:CORP - Politepunk 18:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is being local an unallowance for inclusion, and what does one mean by non-traditional? If someone has suggestions for article amendment, please let me know...User:yabasto 23:37, 30 April 2006

There is a basic standard for inclusion of businesses in Wikipedia (WP:CORP). A local clinic in a small town in Surrey, whether traditional (local doctor or dentist) or otherwise, doesn't meet that standard. Fan1967 00:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well maybe its about time that wikipedia changed it policy and understood that macrocosmic phenomena is supported purely by the microcosm below it. Sieg heil the wikipedia MacDonald supporters...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yabasto (talk • contribs)

Look around your town. How many small businesses as big as yours or bigger? Restaurants, stores, pubs, garages, realtors. At least a few dozen, maybe more. Multiply by at least 1000 to cover the rest of England, multiply again by 10 for US and Canada. Imagine all these businesses get articles. You're looking at a couple hundred thousand entries, and Wikipedia would become the world's largest yellow pages. Fan1967 01:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete just some business. nn . This is not the yellow pages.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 02:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CORP --Deville (Talk) 02:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete minor company. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages! Bjelleklang - talk 02:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:CORP. -- ReyBrujo 17:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.