Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holidayz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Holidayz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD-contested by article creator. Per WP:CRYSTAL. elektrik SHOOS 09:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not finding much for third-party sources and the article makes no assertions of notability. Seems to fail WP:N and WP:V. Additionally, it seems this article is not the first -- a search reveals that Holidayz-The movie has been speedily deleted twice: once per A3 and once per G11. GorillaWarfare ^talk 14:01, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The film fails the notability guidelines of WP:FILMNOT. These guidelines suggest that notability is established through "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Although "significant coverage" is somewhat objective, a basic internet search indicates that this guideline is not met. The guideline also provides a list of attributes to help determine if a film is notable, such as receiving full-length reviews or being of historical significance. These attributes are not met with this pre-production film. Perhaps when/if the film is completed, it may become notable, but it isn't at the moment. See WP:NFF. Wikipeterproject (talk) 16:12, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Waaaay WP:TOOSOON for this article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete piling on and per WP:NFF.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:24, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The movie is not yet finished. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.172.122.159 (talk) 10:04, July 30, 2010

Afd discussions should talk place only on the main page, not the talk page. I've moved the above comment for you. Thanks. elektrik SHOOS 18:05, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.