Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hole-in
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Traditional games in the Philippines#Calahoyo ("Hole-in"). (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hole-in[edit]
- Hole-in (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a How-To guide. This article does not refer to any social importance. It would be better off at WikiHow, whose purpose if to host "how-to" type entries. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggest redirect instead of deletion - to Traditional games in the Philippines#Calahoyo ("Hole-in"), as mentioned below -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per
WP:MADEUPWP:WP#NOTHOWTO. Joe Chill (talk) 17:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is not a made up game, as it is mentioned in A study of Philippine games By Mellie Leandicho Lopez so as that appears to be your only reason for recommending deletion, I think you need to consider it a bit more! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Why wouldn't redirect rather than delete resolve the WP:WP#NOTHOWTO? Rlendog (talk) 02:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and likely merge per discussion here. Hobit (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm suggesting we merge all AfD discussion on these Philippine games to here rather than try to hold three substantially identical conversations. Thanks! Hobit (talk) 20:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have added Bati-Cobra, Calahoyo ("Hole-in"), Lawin at Sisiw ("Hawk and Chicken") and Sambunot to Traditional games in the Philippines, as I feel that this is a more appropriate location for them -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I now think that this article should not be deleted, but redirected to Traditional games in the Philippines#Calahoyo ("Hole-in"), as all the information is now there, and so there is no need for a separate article. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If JoeChill is willing to change his !vote from delete, I am quite happy to perform a non-admin closure on this AfD, and create the redirect, unless there are any other objections. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.