Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hobnox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hobnox[edit]

Declined speedy deletion. The article has no indication of notability and is unreferenced. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 02:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - some WP:N and WP:V indicated by this Stern article. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 06:33, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree that it is notable. Also Alexa ranking of 44,000+ corresponds to the large number of available references. Drawn Some (talk) 07:52, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Topic is notable with a largish number of web hits. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm the (really bad) creator of the article, and I personally believe it should be kept. It has notability for Audiotool. Irish Techno Zombie 16:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, please add some reliable references! Drawn Some (talk) 17:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve through WP:CLEANUP, WP:POTENTIAL, and lack of WP:BEFORE. Not being sourced is a reason to tag for improvement, not for deletion because it has not yet been done. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.