Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hobbit Tales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cubicle 7. There is consensus for a redirect to the top of the Cubicle 7 article. With regards to merging, it can be discussed on the talk page of the Cubicle 7 article, after the AfD nomination of Cubicle 7 is closed, so that merge-work in vain is avoided. Of course, if the merge happens, attribution will have to be respected during the process. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 12:05, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hobbit Tales[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references other than to fanzines and blogs like thegaminggang.com and initiativetabletop.com. BEFORE on Google News, Google Books, and JSTOR fails to find RS mentions. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 09:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 09:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 09:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 09:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 09:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to Cubicle 7. BOZ (talk) 17:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cubicle 7 and redirect, assuming that the Nom drops the stick and withdraws the Cubicle 7 AfD nomination, as he already did with Man, Myth and Magic. Newimpartial (talk) 21:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Cubicle 7 and redirect assuming that the Nom drops the stick and withdraws the Cubicle 7 AfD nomination [1] - I AGF this was extended with the best intentions, however, !vote trading is not in the spirit of the AfD. I am happy to withdraw noms if a convincing argument is made that changes my mind. I don't, however, withdraw noms in exchange for favorable !votes in different noms. I would encourage the closer to evaluate carefully the above !vote when determining consensus. Chetsford (talk) 23:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chet, I am not trying to bribe your !vote. The move to Merge to Cubicle 7 began in the Doctor Who: The Card Game discussion, and in that one you !voted to Merge, even though you are still arguing for a delete in the presumptive Merge target. I think that is an example of GAMING in itself, and have no interest in !voting to merge to an article that is then deleted. You and the closer here can safely assume that, even if you don't drop the stick, as long as Cubicle 7 survives AfD (and it would be a travesty if it didn't, given the available evidence), I would be happy with the merge.

I would advise you to drop the stick, though. The dogs are getting tired. :P Newimpartial (talk) 00:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you taking the time to calibrate the intent behind your comment. Thanks. Chetsford (talk) 00:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cubicle 7 and merge appropriate content. Fails notability in its own right. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As there seems uncertainty over both the the retention or not of the article, as well as whether a merge or redirect would be preferable.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cubical7 per WP:PRODUCT. Sourcing is insufficient to demonstrate independent notability and there is not so much information that it can not be addressed in the company's article. Jbh ^Talk 16:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.