Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoax (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Scott Burley (talk) 07:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax (band)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for Non notable band. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of the band. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 13:29, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 13:29, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - The article absolutely needs to be cleaned up, to remove trivial tidbits and to reduce its reliance on self-created social media sources. However, they have gotten some notice in the alternative music press in some regions: [1], [2]. Admittedly there is not much more to be found, so my vote is "weak keep" and I would not argue with anyone who votes to delete under the WP:TOOSOON standard. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am unsure about the notability of this group. Lubbad85 (☎) 23:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per DOOMSDAYER520. Mosaicberry (talk) 13:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.