Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitler the Tax Dogder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was early delete as no content. Shii (tock) 20:25, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hitler the Tax Dogder[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure what to make of this. Maybe it's supposed to be an article on a TV documentary. Or maybe it's an attempt at an essay on the topic. There's no useful sourced information, so there's nothing to merge, meaning simple deletion is best. Rob (talk) 07:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Why wasn't this article nominated for speedy deletion? --Λeternus ^(talk) 08:19, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I wish there was a speedy category for this, but I can't find it. --Rob (talk) 08:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - I found two sources that make this case a bit more complicated: this and this. --Λeternus ^(talk) 08:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a separate article and possibly add the information into the main Hitler article. It serves no real purpose standing on its own. Intothat darkness 18:42, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced essay. Any reportage about Hitler not paying his taxes belongs in the Hitler article. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Is it a documentary ?, Is it a book ? ... No one knows so delete... –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mein_Kampf#Popularity has a source from the BBC and the original from Spiegel as well: Hitler dodged taxes, expert finds-BBC News Mythos Ladenhüter-Spiegel Online. The info can be added to bio and also to complete the information about the book that made him all the money: Mein Kampf. It is important to note, as his bio does, that the book only sold well once he had entered into political office in 1933. Everyone apparently wanted to see what all the fuss over this new politician was about by reading his book, rather than the success of the book reflecting an interest in what he was saying that led to a movement to get him elected, if you see what I mean. Anarchangel (talk) 23:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Looks like a test edit more than anything. Not an encyclopedic topic. Inherently POV title. If this is a piece on a TV documentary, that documentary is not of sufficient cultural status to pass GNG. Carrite (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.