Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitachi Starboard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 13:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hitachi Starboard[edit]
- Hitachi Starboard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Advertisement, no sources, no notability. Oscarthecat (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge with Hitachi, Ltd.. No individual notability. Theseeker4 (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added some references. -- Eastmain (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Eastmain's sources. They appear to lend a reasonable amount of notability. Raven1977 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Fairly notable, and as usual, Eastmain saves an article DavidWS (contribs) 01:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Advertisement for a whiteboard product? What am I missing? ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is information about a product that has been written about, which squeezes passed wp:n. While not a reason to keep, computer product articles (if sourced) is encyclopedic and useful, particularly years from now, so a short article like this does make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. Not spammy, short and sweet, referenced (thanks to Eastmain). DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 02:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per the sources added by Eastmain. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.