Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the FIFA World Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sango 123 (e) 22:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of the FIFA World Cup[edit]

It is just copied from the FIFA World Cup article, although I can see scope for a good article here, but it is just a copy of the history section in orginial article. --Differentgravy 19:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand. I created this article following a comment on the FAC of the parent. I used the existing history as a starting point, and fully intend to expand it in the next day or two. Oldelpaso 19:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand, per Oldelpaso. There is a valid push by many users to expand the history section, and the FIFA World Cup article is getting too bloated (36kB+), so this daughter article is necessary. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 20:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand just make sure that history is removed from the FIFA article so there's no redundancy. --Strothra 21:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand per Oldelpaso jaco plane 23:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep and expand. During both FA nominations I have suggested strongly to the creators that this article needed to be written. I am glad to see the task has been taken up. It is not in the slightest worthy of deletion. Daniel Case 00:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and do not remove the section from the main article (though abbreviation of the history in the main article might or might not be a good thing). When a break out article is created it is for the sake of further expansion, it does not mean that the topic no longer needs to be covered in the main article. CalJW 01:04, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course --Deville (Talk) 03:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest keep per above. Conscious 04:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per Oldelpaso Aabha (talk) 09:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. CTOAGN (talk) 22:23, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.