Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of sex slavery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected to sexual slavery, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of sex slavery[edit]

~~The article says nothing about the history of sex slavery. Alksub (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)~~ Withdrawn. --Alksub (talk) 22:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to sexual slavery. KnightLago (talk) 22:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unencyclopedic quasi-essay. no need for this as redirect. --Dhartung | Talk 22:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agreed that the present condition is garbage, but this scope/article can be well developed in its own right - its an important and complex topic. Shiva_eVolved 23:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This nomination was withdrawn before any !votes were placed. The nom's concern appears to have been addressed as the user has placed a {{rewrite}} on the article. I'm awaiting further comment before anything else. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral leaning delete Non-neutral, quite possibly incorrectly named article which might not fit in with the other slavery articles. From History of slavery: "There is no clear timeline for the formation of slavery in any formalized sense.", so it lists any significant mentions. There is a Sexual slavery article in the same vein, which would seem to make an article with this title redundant. Someone another (talk) 03:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The nominator has stated his reasons for withdrawal here. Is there any chance that this nomination could be closed, seeing as the !votes were not placed until after withdrawal was stated? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 14:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to sexual slavery. Phyesalis (talk) 14:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to sexual slavery. Somebody should just cut through all this red tape and redirect it, then close this RFA. --Shark face 217 23:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Phyesalis (talk) 23:55, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crap, I'll redirect, somebody just close this RFA. --Shark face 217 23:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took the advice of WP:BOLD and went ahead and redirected, somebody can close this now (I can't find the proper template to close AFDs). --Shark face 217 00:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.