Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinduism in Cyprus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. None of the article content has anything remotely to do with Hinduism, and there's nothing in Religion in Cyprus either. Otherwise, nothing else to merge. Can be recreated as a redirect to Religion in Cyprus if desired. ansh 666 04:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism in Cyprus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources don't discuss Hinduism in Cyprus, they discuss Indo-Cypriot relations and the Indian diasporic community. No indication of notability. Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 04:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Indians in Cyprus and delete the redirect as misleading. The assumption that all Indians are Hindus is quite wrong. Legacypac (talk) 08:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move as per Legacypac, although I'm not sure how much it will add to the Indians in Cyprus article. There is a *small* amount of actual information on Hinduism in Cyprus (mainly architectural/temple related rather than general details) available elsewhere - however the contents of this page would need to be nearly erased and rebuilt for this to function. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed that Indians in Cyprus did not exist because that what this page was. Just delete this title after merging anything useful over. Legacypac (talk) 10:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are a string of "Hinduism by X Country" currently in AfD - unlike this one they are generally on-topic, but do so in extremely minimal detail. As they are, it reads more like a broken up version of Hinduism by country . With more detail for each of them they could be either be paragraphs on that page or an odd new page, since the creator clearly is interested in the area. As to Delete/Merge - they are functionally equivalent here, given presence elsewhere Nosebagbear (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sourcing is simply not there, and the only thing that is sourced is a bit on Cyprus–India relations, which already has that content. Indians in Cyprus also has some overlap, but there is nothing to merge from this article. That leaves deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was expecting this article to say something about Hindusism in Cyprus. About all it does in name drop Mahatma Ghandhi who was a Hindu. The rest says nothing about weather the people are Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Parsis, Jains, Bhudhists, non-religion or what.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Still move/merge, but Religion in Cyprus would be a better, still with the deletion of the relations paragraph. I'm not sure of format for switching in this way with a relisting in the way, so I went rather whole hog on cutting out my previous "vote". Nosebagbear (talk) 09:21, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.