Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himani Sahani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Himani Sahani[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References do not show the notability of the subject. Previously moved to draft. Republish without fixing the issue. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR GermanKity (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of meeting NACTOR or GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 12:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article was speedily deleted just hours ago as WP:A7. No evidence of meeting ~~WP:NCORP~~ WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 13:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Umakant Bhalerao, i just looked at your comment that indicates the subject is CORP. Well WP:NCORP does not apply here.GermanKity (talk) 04:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GermanKity, Yes, you're right. I meant to type NACTOR, but i typed NCORP by accident. Thanks for noticing and letting me know! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability lomrjyo^{(talk•contrib)} 14:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - minor roles so fails WP:NACTOR and no evidence of significant coverage required to meet WP:GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not follows all the guidelines & norms. The sources used are not trustworthy.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 04:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete removed bad and duplicate sources. There is bunch of news on her, but still don't see anything significant. Peter303x (talk) 03:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.