Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilton A. Robertson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hilton A. Robertson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC. WP:BEFORE source searches are only providing fleeting, short coverage and scant passing mentions. The single listed source in the article is a primary source that does not serve to establish notability. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I get a half dozen hits in the Deseret News, which is I think a reliable source, but they basically just mention his name in passing. He has mentions in GBooks in a Mormon book of saints but I can't open it in Canada (silly copyright). Not sure what else can be found about him. Oaktree b (talk) 18:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with the nom on this one. Very unlikely to be sufficient sources to pass WP:GNG, especially given that this person was mostly only a local leader for the church in a few specific areas. Rollidan (talk) 09:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I do not see reason to doubt that the content is true, but the subject seems NN to me. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unref'd for nearly a decade, fails WP:GNG with no sig. coverage. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.