Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilary Barraford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Barraford[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR - none of her acting projects meet this stand, no SIGCOV. Rogermx (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I think the subject's roles in The Ice Cream Truck and Go for Sisters are enough to pass WP:NACTOR—but the more salient issue is sourcing. Based on the sources in the article and those I have found (https://deadline.com/2018/08/jamie-lynn-sigler-horror-film-hunting-season-1202437936/, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/ice-cream-truck-clip-a-sweet-tooths-worst-nightmare-974138 and https://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/08/movies/go-for-sisters-a-thriller-from-john-sayles.html), I don't think there is enough to meet WP:SIGCOV. I'm voting "Weak Keep" for the moment, and will wait and see if any progress is made regarding sourcing. Dflaw4 (talk) 10:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no credible indication of notability outside of those two films that Dflaw4 mentioned, one of which (The Ice Cream Truck) has been tagged as potentially not notable. If found not notable, that would make them only notable for the other film. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 15:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per user:Dflaw4. Lack of significant coverage is clear evidence of a lack of notability for a stand alone article. Otr500 (talk) 01:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've found another source that shows the subject was in a play called Cuckoo Nest. Unfortunately, it was just another passing mention. I won't update my vote—but, needless to say, WP:GNG is still an issue. Dflaw4 (talk) 05:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.