Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hilar[edit]

nn neologism used in one place only. google says other meanings of the word are far more common. signed too. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 06:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:WINAD. Royboy crashfan 06:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP is not a dictionary. (aeropagitica) 06:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, PROD. T K E 07:12, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, maybe for wiktionary but seems very uncommon Gu 08:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable neo Celcius 13:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologism, dicdef. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hilum as its adjective form and a commonly used term in anatomy/pathology. Thatcher131 16:09, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Gracious, I hope that medical students aren't using Wikipedia! :) T K E 08:23, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Thatcher131. ProhibitOnions 16:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.