Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilabago

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge/Redirect to Dagami, Leyte. JERRY ^talk _contribs 02:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hilabago[edit]

Does not qualify WP:LOCAL. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 07:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a barangay, a unit of local government in the Philippines. I think it should be regarded as automatically notable, on the principle that all towns and villages are notable. The 2000 census listed it with 444 inhabitants (or 91 households). --Eastmain (talk) 10:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. barangays are not towns, rather they are parts of towns, so they do not meet the automatic qualifications given by WP:LOCAL and WP:OUTCOMES. Therefore, for them to be kept they should pass WP:NOTE. Google only says that a Japanese camp was set there during WWII (I'm pretty sure Japanese camps are everywhere during the Japanese occupation.) That does not give a very good argument for notability.--Lenticel ^(talk) 12:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Dagami, Leyte until this barangay have a considerable coverage to merit a separate article. --bluemask ^(talk) 14:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Bluemask. cab (talk) 00:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 00:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge. Almost all barangays in the Philippines are not notable enough in themselves to merit individual articles in Wikipedia and there is a problem of getting enough reliable sources to create a full-fledged article. A simple Google search does not turn up any non-trivial sources that refer to this barangay. For similar deletion debates see [1] and [2]. --seav (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.