Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikmat Nafi Shaukat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards to qualify for a standalone article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hikmat Nafi Shaukat[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Once again, a BLP with serious concerns. Sourcing, at first glance looks okay-ish, but look again. Hikmat Nafi Shaukat appears in lists and groups, yet very little information--too little to access notability--is about him. I am afraid this is more of a coatrack for CIA torture than an actual encyclopedic article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not sure I see the BLP concerns here (it seems to pass V and DUE, one could argue on PERP and lack of conviction - but CIA black sites are a murky business). The subject isn't close to passing WP:SIGCOV - the sources in the article do not establish this, and a BEFORE does not find much more. Much of the content of the present article is a POVFORK/COATRACK on Black sites - with the article really being about Hikmat Nafi Shaukat's incarceration at a black site - which does not seem independently notable from Black site. I don't think there is anything here worth merging to Black Site.Icewhiz (talk) 23:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of WP:SIGCOV despite the fact that he is one of a number of detainees discussed with relation to "black sites."E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete total lack of GNG passing. At one point editors of Wikipedia tried to have articles on everyone detained at Guantanamo Bay, detained by the CIA, allegedly detained by the CIA, and related mass directory lists. We have since moved away from such uncontrolled mass inclusion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.