Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikari Hino (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hikari Hino[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, interviews, commercial websites, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. The first AfD closed as "Keep" in 2006; the second ended in "No consensus" in 2008. PORNBIO has been significantly tightened since then, so I believe it's a good time to revisit. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 02:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 02:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 02:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 02:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough reliable sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:GNG or WP:PORNBIO at this time Atlantic306 (talk) 19:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO. Prolificness was deprecated from PORNBIO 10 years ago and reliable sources are needed to attest to to unique contributions to porn. The references in the article are unreliable. Fails WP:GNG without significant reliable source coverage. • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 16:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.