Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Commission of Saint Lucia, London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 18:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

High Commission of Saint Lucia, London[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. This article merely confirms its existence with a bit of unverified trivia. There is also no bilateral article to merge to. ~~Also nominating;~~

~~High Commission of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, London~~

LibStar (talk) 11:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The building is the work of distinguished architects Ernest George and Harold Peto and so there is more to be done here per WP:PRESERVE. Andrew (talk) 07:05, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew, if that's the case it would be good to have a source so we can "proclaim" it notable. LibStar, if that is indeed the case it might be worth splitting these joint nominations so that they can be dealt with separately. Stalwart111 11:21, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

now separated. LibStar (talk) 06:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good start. I'm inclined to think this one should be kept and the other deleted. The focus here, clearly, should be the building itself. Stalwart111 08:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- We have lists of diplomatic missions by country. Unfortuantely, those for this country are under-develoiped in WP. Since St Lucia is part of the Commonwealth, it has a High Commission to the UK goverment, rahter than an embassy to the head of state. This is a bad stub, but it ought to exist. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you haven't given any reason how WP:ORG is met. LibStar (talk) 14:01, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.