Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hidayatullah Kheshgi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hidayatullah Kheshgi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN, WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. References are passing mentions. scope_creep^Talk 20:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable as a businessman nor as a politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current sources are mostly passing mentions, fails WP:NPOLITICIAN, WP:GNG. Setreis (talk) 15:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreed. Non-notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO --Kemalcan (talk) 22:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Reliable sources not found. Non notable person. TheDreamBoat (talk) 00:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly unfounded biased views by the same user who nominated the Article previously. Sources are reliable as they have been disseminated by a diverse range of news agencies operating in the same environment of the subject. Article meets WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG as notability is corroborated by the subject's political position. Former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, who is the former Chief Executive of the State and political party's founder has attested several times that the notable subject is the party's (APML) incumbent chairman. Other references regarding the subject's activities with regard to business {for e.g. PIA Board Membership) and politics further deduces the notability of the subject. CaptainNathonson (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm suprised how this is happening for the second time now. As the above user said, one-sided attitudes by the same user who doesn't understand the meaning of "notability". Article meets WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG as this has been confirmed many times by various agencies that the notable politican is the incumbent chairman of a high esteemed political party prevalent in the same area of the subject, the area which is Pakistan. ISI-DeputyDG (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the WP:SPA that that voted in the previous Afd. Has made 16 edits to Wikipedia. scope_creep^Talk 18:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. --Devoke water 22:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:POLOUTCOMES - we have tended to keep the leader/ president/ executive director of major political parties of larger nations. Bearian (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete. Per nom. Additionally, WP:POLOUTCOMES does not apply as the individual is the leader of a political party with no currently elected officials. In other words, it’s not a major party but a minor political fringe group.4meter4 (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.