Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiago Rodrigues Reis de Queirós

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hiago Rodrigues Reis de Queirós[edit]

Non-notable writer per WP:AUTHOR. No independent reliable sources prove notability. It's a case of cross-wiki spam (see comments below). Algébrico (talk) 17:54, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment #1 In portuguese Wikipedia the article was deleted once: pt:Wikipedia:Páginas para eliminar/Hiago Rodrigues Reis de Queirós/1. pt:User:Profmiguel recreated the same article again. It was created another AFD: pt:Wikipedia:Páginas para eliminar/Hiago Rodrigues Reis de Queirós. He also created a sock-puppet pt:User:Wikicorretor (See: CheckUser case) to edit the article and try to convince that the article should be kept. When the article was was about to be deleted, pt:User:Wikicorretor called several people to keep and after a week the article was kept because AfD in portuguese Wikipedia is based on number of votes, not arguments (the article is deleted only if 2/3 or more vote to delete). Algébrico (talk) 17:54, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment #2 User:Maxrichard seems to be another sockpuppet. Compare: [1], [2] and [3]. Algébrico (talk) 18:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment #3 Hiago's so-called "literary movement" was deleted once in Portuguese Wikipedia: pt:Wikipedia:Páginas para eliminar/O Manifesto Realtragista. It's original research. Algébrico (talk) 17:54, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. —Algébrico (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Algébrico (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Algébrico (talk) 17:58, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete It is a clear case of cross-wiki vanity/spam. All his books were self published, and almost all (if not all) were published by Clube dos Autores, where anyone can publish a book without any fee or reviewing. The author hasn't been convered by RS: no results at google books or Scielo. The article does not present any RS, only pages created by Hiago himself and a link to web 2.0 site where anyone can post reviews about any book. As Algébrico explained, the article has been deleted several times on wiki.pt per lack of notability and has only been kept this time because the discussion was influenced by sockpuppetry and strong canvassing. Lechatjaune (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The principal at work here is that articles in the English Wikipedia should, especially in doubtful cases, have at least some substantiation in reliable sources available in English. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR. Doesn´t indicate any notability. No independent reliable sources (note: Afd-pt was also influenced by self-constructed fake-sources). Obvious COI/cross wiki spam case. Btw: next envolved sock identified in pt:Wikipedia:Pedidos a verificadores/Arquivo/2009/06#Willkon D C E.--Gunnex (talk) 08:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.