Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hi-Rise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-Rise[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. I can't find any significant coverage of this group. One top-89 hit which was included in a few compilation albums doesn't establish notability either. Lennart97 (talk) 19:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 19:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 19:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to demonstrate WP:GNG. Nexus000 (talk) 02:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet the criteria for inclusion. Deb (talk) 12:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough notable yet. Namkongville (talk) 09:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:NMUSIC. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG & Music. TheDreamBoat (talk) 13:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, fails WP:MUSICBIO CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:39, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG Devoke water 13:46, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.