Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hezekiah Griggs III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Hús ö nd 04:52, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hezekiah Griggs III[edit]

Vanity, vanity, all is vanity. This is vanity. - crz crztalk 00:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete vain vanity in vain... er, coi! Danny Lilithborne 00:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Delete. It's the lack of sources that bothers me most, followed closely behind by the majority of the content being positive comments. Also, Google doesn't get a whole lot of relevant hits. PullToOpen 00:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Abstain. Clearly vanity, and poorly written. On the other hand, I dont know anything about him so I dont know if he is notable.
Delete, mostly per WP:COI. Also, a majority of the comments cannot be sourced, and the information that is available (interviews on the local news, etc.) don't seem to meet the multiple non-trivial sources quota laid out in WP:BIO. Essentially a puff biography of an apparently non-notable C-level individual of a non-notable company which does not meet WP:CORP. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Abstain Seems vain, but if it is added to a bit more, might come around to being ok. (Liveforever22 02:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]
- Have no fear, abstain strongly! - crz crztalk 03:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete A7. --Dennisthe2 02:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete re Dennisthe2 jaydj 03:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 05:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails per WP:COI,WP:BIO and [1].--John Lake 05:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per User:John Lake--C.lettinga 06:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Vanity, vanity, all is vanity, sayeth Quoheleth. SkierRMH,06:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoa! You're going biblical on me? (It's Kohelet.) - crz crztalk 08:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lovely Dickensian name, though; but the fictional biography you begin to imagine upon hearing the name Hezekiah Griggs III is almost certainly more interesting than the actual person's. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.