Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hetty King (disambiguation) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Result also supported by the MOS discussion the nominator started, linked below. postdlf (talk) 22:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hetty King (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only two legitimate entries; the wife of a Confederate general is utterly unnotable. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep meets guidelines for disambiguation pages. Three entries, all valid. Wife of general meets MOS:DABMENTION, which is theguideline we'd be looking for here, not WP:NOTABILITY. (If a topic does not have an article of its own, but is mentioned within another article, then a link to that article should be included.) Boleyn (talk) 05:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The woman is mentioned exactly once in her husband's article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Which is sufficient. If it's not suitable for disambiguation, it should not be mentioned even once. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:58, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I heartily disagree, and have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages#Clarification about "Items appearing within other articles". Clarityfiend (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep as I observed above. Ambiguity on Wikipedia exists for this name, and must be disambiguated. This navigational page is both required and legitimate. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.