Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hetracil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hetracil[edit]
There is nothing in the article or the links to suggest that this is a notable spoof/website/blog/social commentary. Deli nk 15:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Don't see how this meets WP:WEB Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 15:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Although very short-lived, this was an important spoof/social comment at the time, highlighting public attitudes to male homosexuality. It was notable at the time, and is now a historical curiosity. We're "not paper", so I think the article passes muster. WMMartin 17:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: To clarify for me, are you arguing that it is not notable now; but since it was notable at one time in the past, it should be kept? Deli nk 19:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: Could you provide sources for this short-lived notability? --Fang Aili talk 22:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete 2,170 non-trivial google hits, which suggests deletion. On the other hand, it's funny. Uucp 18:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per views of User:WMMartin Xdenizen 19:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. --Fang Aili talk 22:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No assertion of notability. --- RockMFR 23:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only references are a blog, themselves, and a dead link. I need to see a reference showing that this is or even was notable at some time, then I may change my vote. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 20:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.