Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hester Ford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hester Ford[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOPAGE. All meaningful info (name, birth date, nationality, state of residence, (and eventually her death date) is already recorded concisely at List of American supercentenarians and elsewhere. Half this article is about someone else; a list entry is all that is needed. Newshunter12 (talk) 02:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly less notable than many other supercentenarians who failed Afd. Fails GNG. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 06:54, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just living an extremely long time does not make one default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is nothing of notability within her life, and even her age not being in the top half of the List of the verified oldest people is not notable.TFBCT1 (talk) 14:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable --Devokewater @ 16:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. 172.58.107.161 (talk) 16:48, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of American supercentenarians. --Lockley (talk) 21:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.