Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herogiri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice to an early renomination Wifione ^Message 10:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herogiri[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF, Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles. Here I can't see any reliable sources other than those unreliable tweets. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Future films with no significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources doesn't pass our notability threshold for films. Clear TOOSOON case. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 11:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 16:40, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (gab) @ 20:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 2 sources have been added after the nomination, but it's not multiple for me. However, the article can be re-created once film start receiving good coverage. --Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 01:29, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The issue was related to principal photography as a proof of the film's existence. There are indeed references in the article (other than those tweets) which belong to TOI, one of India's leading news agencies. There is also an iTunes link indicating about the audio release and a link to a video of the motion poster by the official YT channel of the production house. The film features some leading actors from Tollywood and hence, is notable. -- Bubaikumar (talk) 07:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Filming has commenced and the film topic is receiving coverage. WP:NFF (paragraph 3) is met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:33, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@MichaelQSchmidt: In the current state it doesn't meet our standards. All those unreliable tweets and youtube links doesn't demonstrate notability. Two sources of TOI is not enough for a film that is yet to release and remember WP:NOTNEWS. While you say "film topic is receiving coverage" but I don't see how. If you can, please try to add some reliable sources, but not WP:SPS. (Note to closing admin/editor. Bubaikumar is the creator of this article.) Bubaikumar, the film features leading actors of Tollywood doesn't mean the film is notable. Remember WP:NOTINHERIT. I may change my mind if some one could improve this article per WP:HEY. Jim Carter 13:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD Herogiri Rabi Kinagi Dev Koel Mallick Sayantika Banerjee Mithun Chakraborty

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.