Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero's 10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Feel free to renominate after a suitable grace period in the hope of getting a more lively discussion, but as it is, no counter-argument has been made to the argument that the events are notable by virtue of the participants' notability. However, the lack of a counter-argument to an argument that does not necessarily reflect consensus or guidelines is not in itself sufficient for a "keep" result. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In light of further information about the propriety of some of the participants brought to my attention following the close, I amending the result to delete all. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hero's 10[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

procedural listing as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero's 2007 in Korea. also nominating:

Hero's Lithuania 2007
Hero's 9

LibStar (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 03:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 03:26, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - more than half the fighters are notable.Stuartyeates (talk) 06:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

that is not a criterion for notabiility. a weekly English Premier League match would have all notable players, but we don't create articles for these matches. LibStar (talk) 01:06, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should create such articles. --The Bachmann Editor Overdrive (talk) 17:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable sporting results.--Phospheros (talk) 12:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't find any lasting notability for these events. Mdtemp (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to participation of notable fighters, which gives the event historic importance. --The Bachmann Editor Overdrive (talk) 17:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to WP:SPORTSEVENT. This is just routine sports coverage. Astudent0 (talk) 19:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Per WP:RECENTISM, WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, and WP:GNG. Meets no section of WP:EVENT. Not all sporting events are notable. Zero sources independent of the subject. BusterD (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all due to notability. Google searching does seem to turn up sources independent of the events. --131.123.123.124 (talk) 16:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all They all fail WP:SPORTSEVENT and are just routine sports coverage. Astudent0 (talk) 19:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all as special events. Besides, what would we rather have be a blue link: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero's 10 or Hero's 10? I reckon the latter is more useful fro people than the former. --143.105.13.115 (talk) 19:39, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.