Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermann Neuling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 23:45, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hermann Neuling[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged as unsourced since 2008, so for about 14 years. I did searching for sources in all the links with the article and in a few other google searches. The German article does have a source, but it looks to just be a catalog entry without substance. I can find a few name drops on one of his works, but nothing in a reliable source about him. I found one blog where someone was asking if others had information on Neuling, and another blog that did say a little about him. The first 2 works on Google scholar are works by a different Hermann Neuling, since one predates his birth and the other was published when he was 5, this person was not publishing academic works on German history at age 5 (I use publishing instead of writing not because I think there are 5 year olds writing academic level works on history period, but because academic publishing especially usually takes a while, so a book that comes out of an academic press in 2021 will often have been fully written by mid-2018 or earlier. As far as I can tell there are not sources out there that give indepth coverage of Neuling at the level we would need to have a biography that says anything of substance. John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:14, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 14:25, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreed, I don't think we can find much more than what's here, I've tried. Nothing found. Oaktree b (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did find what I consider to be significant coverage, in case it changes your perspective. Note: both by the same author in the same journal, but in different years. CT55555 (talk) 17:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A google books search of his name produces pages of results. None significant coverage, but does confirm he created a large body of work. The significant coverage that proves notability can be found as follows:

12 mentions here (search inside by surname only) STONESTREET, R. Pedagogical Works for Low Horn. Horn Call: Journal of the International Horn Society, [s. l.], v. 45, n. 2, p. 53–57, 2015. Disponível em: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=100276801&site=eds-live&scope=site. Acesso em: 28 jun. 2022.
11 mentions here: STONESTREET, R. Twentieth-Century Solos for Low Horn. Horn Call: Journal of the International Horn Society, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 1, p. 52–56, 2016. Disponível em: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=119061452&site=eds-live&scope=site. Acesso em: 28 jun. 2022. CT55555 (talk) 17:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.