Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heritage Christian School (Indianapolis)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sr 13 03:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heritage Christian School (Indianapolis)[edit]

Article about non-notable high school; originally proposed for deletion in February 2007 but no action was taken. No substantial improvements have been made since then; article remains unsourced except to school's own web page. --Nonstopdrivel 05:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a 1,500-student school covering all grades. I see nothing so wrong with it that it should go, and, as (in part) a high school, it's inherently notable, as I argue here. Noroton 18:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The size and scope of the school, together with the multiple sports championships establish notability. Alansohn 19:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable private school. With all 12 grades (like many religious schools) it has only about 1500 kids. Most highschools are over a thousand and that only 3 or 4 grades. Being a 2A school with a couple good teams and coverage in a local paper is not substantial. Every high school sports program gets local news coverage. There is nothing notable to distinguish this school from any other of the tens of thousands of highschools in America. NeoFreak 04:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per state championships (basketball in Indiana, no less) . Neier 06:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sports program and state championships have received significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources, so WP:N and WP:V are satisfied. --Butseriouslyfolks 05:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.