Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert Koziol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Koziol[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Related to Herbert Schendl. See discussion here: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Herbert_Schendl,_Herbert_Koziol_et_al.. no indication of notability and author has obvious conflict of interest. Polyamorph (talk) 06:13, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 06:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 06:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:PROF #1, "significant impact in their scholarly discipline" as demonstrated by sources, and PROF #5 "held a named chair appointment". The Festschrift currently cited shows some significant impact. Moreover, Otto Jespersen includes a section on Koziol and his Handbuch der englischen Wortbildunglehre in Jespersen's A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. I would guess more sources may be available in German. Also, I'm not certain whether the Austrian Academy of Sciences is selective in the way that The Royal Society is, but if so he also satisfies PROF #3. I assume, based on the current content of the article, that COI issues are surmountable. Cnilep (talk) 01:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:39, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – as stated in the notability guidelines Academics/professors WP:NACADEMIC meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. And as Cnilep pointed out above Prof. Koziol definitively meets #1 - 3 and 5. ShoesssS ^Talk 15:01, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.