Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert Brownstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Walton ^{Need some help?} 18:53, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Herbert Brownstein

Herbert Brownstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

this article should be deleted because it is blatant advertizing with misleading or incorrect statements Vancouverlaw 20:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Could You enlighten us, which are the blatant advertizing parts, the ones with misleading statements and which are incorrect statements? Thanks, feydey 23:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete the work he is doing would certain have been reported in professional and mass media. Details can be taken from his professional CV, but the major accomplishments must be sourced.DGG 05:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep This reads like a corporate resume, particularly phrases like "A significant portion of Mr. Brownstein's practise is devoted to advice on commercial law, international business law and litigious matters. He is also responsible for overseeing the direction of their associated offices worldwide." But some of the statemsnts included would make him, IMO at least marginally notable if they are sourced. This needs to be cleaned up, and cut down, and what remain needs to be sourced. Then it will either be a keeper, or it will be clearer that it should be deleted. DES ^(talk) 13:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I've cleaned up the article a little, and sourced his election to the municipal council position. DES ^(talk) 14:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I have spoken personally to Mr. Brownstein, and we have resolved my concerns. I have also advised Mr. Brownstein that the cleaning up done by DES has made the article quite acceptable. Thank you DES and Mr. Brownstein.Vancouverlaw 23:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Notable lawyer for which there is not enough WP:RS material to write an attributable article on the topic. Thus, the topic does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines and the article cannot meet Wikipedia article policies. --

Jreferee 06:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Notable and wiki-fied. Ryanrider 23:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. He has roughly the same claim to notablity as any reasonably succesful lawyer who has been in practice for any extended period of time.--Kubigula (talk) 17:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.