Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry louis adams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is clearly to delete this rather promotional article on someone who isn't notable. DGG ( talk ) 23:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Henry louis adams[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a local minister who had a minor role in a series but not enough to meet WP:NACTOR, has written some books but not enough to meet WP:AUTHOR, and had a trivial mention in the news but not enough WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG. It should be noted that there are several other people including church ministers that share his name including one from 1933 when conducting WP:BEFORE. Mkdw ^talk 06:34, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:02, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:02, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While I absolutely and most certainly admire him for being an advocate against celebratory gunfire, there just isn't anything out there to show that he passes notability guidelines. The coverage for his activism hasn't really focused on him and there isn't enough of it. None of his roles have received coverage, nor are they so overwhelmingly notable that he'd be able to pass on that front. As far as his books go, none of them have received any in-depth coverage or reviews from RS. There's just no notability here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 23:48, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pretty local item. History2007 (talk) 08:40, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's insufficient coverage of the man himself. Doesn't reach the level of notability for a bio. Jason from nyc (talk) 17:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.