Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Homeyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) buff bills 7701 00:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Homeyer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see this as the bio of a notable author, but rather of the author of some local interest gardening books. DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The listing of his book by the Christian Science Monitor is significant, but it's only one source. We need multiple sources (with nontrivial coverage of the subject or his works beyond bylines in local newspapers) for WP:GNG. I could be convinced to change my mind if more good sources turn up. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:54, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 19:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep In addition to Christian Science Monitor, there are book reviews in Northeast Naturalist and BookList, plus a couple local sources in the article. It's a borderline case. -- GreenC 21:40, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.