Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Harrison Hunkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Harrison Hunkins[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable politician. Fails to establish notability. reddogsix (talk) 18:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. H.H.H. should be kept as an article. He is involved in early Wisconsin politics and is well sourced. - Kbabej (talk) 18:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: As the creator of this article, Kbabej has a conflict of interest, so it is not proper for Kbabej to be weighing in here. 71.139.148.125 (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 71.139.148.125 (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

KEEP. This article focuses on an early settler and public servant of WI that served in many positions. Establishes notability IMO. -AndyR112 (talk) 18:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: AndyR112 is a suspected sock-puppet of Kbabej. See AndyR112's edits. 71.139.148.125 (talk) 17:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 71.139.148.125 (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. County treasurer for one year + street commissioner + member of local good-ol' boys' club = non-notable politician. 71.139.148.125 (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Did not have important positions. But, it is very appropriate and even expected for the creater of the article to come here and try to defend their work. they have every right to comment. Once. DGG ( talk ) 03:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.