Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henri Vincent-Anglade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 11:38, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Henri Vincent-Anglade[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist, no significant coverage in reliable sources. The references are identical, and are from the art gallery studios that show his work. COI, creator of article owns this artists work. All I could find were ebay and auction sites selling his prints. Netherzone (talk) 22:28, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 22:28, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 00:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 23:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Henri Vincent-Anglade should be kept and tagged for more citations. It has been up since 2014. Not sure why you would flag this for deltion and not René Vincent, which has no citations. I agree that Henri Vincent-Anglade does not have enough secondary sources, but at least give the Wikipedia community, and me, a chance to see the artist and add to the page. Assume a bit of WP:AGF. I enjoy Wikipedia and doing the research. Since it is an ecyclopedia, it should cover artists that have public works. --Greg Henderson (talk) 23:06, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Henderson, you are free to AfD the other article, or PROD it. I determined that this artist was non-notable after the BEFORE search I performed. It seems interesting that this artist is in your personal collection as indicated just after you created the article. That may be a WP:COI since you might have a financial stake in this artist's notability. Netherzone (talk) 00:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT. I found him in the benezit ([1]) and I believe he's notable, but that article is a copyvio. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 10:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My aticle was a translation from french to english and was not verbatim and gave credit to author. I have since been in touch with the author of the page and she has given me permission to use the picture and info. I've added the link to Benezit Dictionary of Artists to this page. Sounds like from above, Comte0 believes he's notable. --Greg Henderson (talk) 15:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We can't use any contents that someone granted permission on specific-use basis. All contents used here must be legitimately in the public domain or the owner of copyright must irrevocably surrender all future control and release under the proper Creative Commons license in a way that is independently verifiable, meaning an editor saying "owner has given permission" is not adequate. Graywalls (talk) 17:47, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of permission, the article was properly sourced from the following citation: www.montmart.org. --Greg Henderson (talk) 18:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, that website fails WP:RS, WP:SPS. Graywalls (talk) 19:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have replaced the website URL with a valid citation that meets WP:GNG guidelines. The new citation is at: www.oxfordartonline.com.--Greg Henderson (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~, somewhat reluctantly. The artist has had some works appear in the higher level auctions such as Christie's and Bonham's. However, besides the Benezit and montmart.org sources, I can find nothing at all. Willing to change my vote if someone can add at least one other decent source. Curiocurio (talk) 01:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Thanks to Greg Henderson below, I was able to find at least mentions in numerous early 20th century French sources, all respectable. With the Benezit entry, I think he scrapes over the GNG bar. Curiocurio (talk) 02:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Curiocurio A lot of Henri Vincent-Anglade showings in Paris are coming up on hathitrust.org searches. For example, he mentioned in the catalog of the Salon. 1901 - 1909; and in 15 periodicals. On archive.org/, there is a 1906 article that reads: "...bequeathed to the Beauvais Museum a picture by Vincent-Anglade entitled "Intimate," once shown at the [Paris] Salon See the Paris Letter. --Greg Henderson (talk) 21:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I imagine the article has improved since the nom, but the current sourcing is fine: independent, third party and reliable: passes WP:BASIC. ——Serial 16:34, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.