Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hengwah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowball delete hoax `'юзырь:mikka 22:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hengwah[edit]

Tagged for speedy and contested. I declined the speedy because it doesn't meet the threshold of patent nonsense in my opinion. It is however an unverified neologism that should be deleted, so I'm listing it here. Isotope23 13:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Hengwah the Nom. (I may have to start using this word, though). Nothing on the Google. Unreferenced. Flyguy649^talk_contribs 13:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hengwah to that!--Isotope23 14:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This looks like an attempt to popularize a neologism by claiming ancient origins for it. --Metropolitan90 14:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ASAP as utter nonsense, before the politicians get wind of it. A word that can mean whatever you want it to has to be kept out of their hands (I mean lips). Clarityfiend 16:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced claims. Remember, "hengwah" spelled backward is "hawgneh" Edison 16:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find this in any reputable dictionary or other linguistic source.--Rossheth | Talk 19:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.