Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemus Air Flight 7081
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 11:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hemus Air Flight 7081[edit]
- Hemus Air Flight 7081 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability Petebutt (talk) 08:41, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Further to my nomination, the incident did not involve casualties or even a real bomb or weapon and the hi-jacker was not ä real terrorist"in his own words, and just wanted assylum.--Petebutt (talk) 08:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Significant coverage in reliable sources. Rettetast (talk) 13:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep meets WP:GNG. Significant coverage in reliable sources also years after the incident. It resulted in a major political discussion regarding how Norwegian authorities should deal with hijacking, so it is not "just an asylum seeker". Similarly, he also claimed he was under orders to crash the aircraft in Oslo. Arsenikk (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, A Google search brings up multiple hits showing not only showing media attention at the time of the incident but also coverage following it. Seems like it fits the notability requirements. Holyfield1998 (talk) 20:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The event was widely covered by the Norwegian media, and led to a political debate over the issue. Meets the general notability guideline.--xanchester (t) 12:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Way too many references in face of WP:WHYN. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 21:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.